Image

Protecting vulnerable consumers from risky investing
Financial Conduct Authority
Image

Reducing cigarette butt littering
NSW Environmental Protection Authority
Image

Understanding consumer passivity in subscription markets
Danish Competition and Consumer Authority
Image

Boosting the accuracy of tax returns
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Image

Examining the impact of gamification on online trading
Ontario Securities Commission
Image

Improving energy debt communications
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets
Image

Image

Testing the applications of generative artificial intelligence
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Image

Supporting consumer decisions around add-on insurance
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Image

Understanding how consumers would value a central bank digital currency
The Reserve Bank of Australia
Image

Increasing survey response rates to better assess education providers
NSW Department of Education
Image

Improving early childhood education and care quality assessments
NSW Early Childhood Education and Care Regulatory Authority
Glossary of experimental designs
This guide was developed by the NSW Behavioural Insights Unit on behalf of the NSW Productivity and Equality Commission. It will help you understand the different types of experimental designs, from easy to advanced.
A/B testing
A simplified form of a randomised control trial (RCT) where participants are randomly shown one of two versions (A or B) of a webpage, app or other product.
These tests often focus on optimising a single outcome. They can also be iterative: once version A wins, it may be compared with a new version C. This type of study is typically easy to implement, especially with digital tools and platforms that automate the process.
Before-and-after-study
A study that measures and compares outcomes before and after a treatment or intervention.
These studies are relatively simple to design and analyse. However, a key limitation is that results can be influenced by external factors (for example, changes in the weather across the study period might affect outcomes), and this cannot be distinguished from the effect of the intervention.
Discrete choice experiment (DCE)
A research method used to elicit preferences by asking participants to choose between sets of alternative options that have varying features.
This approach helps in understanding decision-making and the value placed on different features. While DCEs are not as resource-intensive as RCTs, they require careful design and sophisticated analysis to accurately interpret the trade-offs participants are willing to make.
Online experiment
A study conducted over the internet where participants complete tasks or respond to questions remotely. This allows researchers to reach a larger and more diverse group of participants rapidly, compared to traditional lab settings.
A common limitation of online experiments is reduced external validity - the extent to which findings can be generalised to real-world settings. This is because online experiments often do not reflect the real-world context of the behaviour being studied. However, when the behaviour of interest is performed online, this gap is reduced. External validity is less of an issue in these cases, especially when using a simulated online environment that closely mimics real-world settings.
Quasi-experiment
A research design that resembles an experiment but does not involve randomly assigning participants to different groups.
Due to the lack of randomisation, quasi-experiments are susceptible to various biases. One common bias is self-selection bias, where participants who choose to take part might be more motivated and therefore perform differently - either better or worse - based on their reasons for participating. These biases can complicate the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships.
Randomised control trial (RCT)
A study in which participants are randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.
This randomisation allows researchers to measure the causal effect of the treatment by comparing outcomes between the groups. RCTs are considered the gold standard for determining causal relationships.
Contact NSW Productivity and Equality Commission
We are committed to continuous improvement and welcome your feedback.
Complete our online form to be added to our mailing list, or provide general feedback.