Regulatory experimentation case studies

Explore real-life regulatory experimentation case studies. Our glossary helps you understand the different types of experimental designs you can use.

Image

protecting vulnerable consumers from risky investing hero image

Protecting vulnerable consumers from risky investing

Financial Conduct Authority

Image

Bench in park

Reducing cigarette butt littering

NSW Environmental Protection Authority

Image

understanding consumer passivity in subscription markets hero banner

Understanding consumer passivity in subscription markets

Danish Competition and Consumer Authority

Image

boosting the accuracy of tax returns hero banner

Boosting the accuracy of tax returns

Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore

Image

Person holding a mobile phone

Examining the impact of gamification on online trading

Ontario Securities Commission

Image

A view of a typical energy bill

Improving energy debt communications

Office of Gas and Electricity Markets

Image

Illustration of Artificial Intelligence

Testing the applications of generative artificial intelligence

Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Image

Two people having a discussion on a table

Supporting consumer decisions around add-on insurance

Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Image

Parent and child playing on a table

Improving early childhood education and care quality assessments

NSW Early Childhood Education and Care Regulatory Authority

Glossary of experimental designs

This guide was developed by the NSW Behavioural Insights Unit on behalf of the NSW Productivity and Equality Commission. It will help you understand the different types of experimental designs, from easy to advanced.

Level: Easy

A/B testing

A simplified form of a randomised control trial (RCT) where participants are randomly shown one of two versions (A or B) of a webpage, app or other product.

These tests often focus on optimising a single outcome. They can also be iterative: once version A wins, it may be compared with a new version C. This type of study is typically easy to implement, especially with digital tools and platforms that automate the process.

Before-and-after-study

A study that measures and compares outcomes before and after a treatment or intervention.

These studies are relatively simple to design and analyse. However, a key limitation is that results can be influenced by external factors (for example, changes in the weather across the study period might affect outcomes), and this cannot be distinguished from the effect of the intervention.

Level: Moderate

Discrete choice experiment (DCE)

A research method used to elicit preferences by asking participants to choose between sets of alternative options that have varying features.

This approach helps in understanding decision-making and the value placed on different features. While DCEs are not as resource-intensive as RCTs, they require careful design and sophisticated analysis to accurately interpret the trade-offs participants are willing to make.

Online experiment

A study conducted over the internet where participants complete tasks or respond to questions remotely. This allows researchers to reach a larger and more diverse group of participants rapidly, compared to traditional lab settings.

A common limitation of online experiments is reduced external validity - the extent to which findings can be generalised to real-world settings. This is because online experiments often do not reflect the real-world context of the behaviour being studied. However, when the behaviour of interest is performed online, this gap is reduced. External validity is less of an issue in these cases, especially when using a simulated online environment that closely mimics real-world settings.

Quasi-experiment

A research design that resembles an experiment but does not involve randomly assigning participants to different groups.

Due to the lack of randomisation, quasi-experiments are susceptible to various biases. One common bias is self-selection bias, where participants who choose to take part might be more motivated and therefore perform differently - either better or worse - based on their reasons for participating. These biases can complicate the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships.

Level: Advanced

Randomised control trial (RCT)

A study in which participants are randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.

This randomisation allows researchers to measure the causal effect of the treatment by comparing outcomes between the groups. RCTs are considered the gold standard for determining causal relationships.

Get guidance

You can download a PDF version of the glossary of experimental design.

Want help designing your own experiment? Contact us.

Contact NSW Productivity and Equality Commission

We are committed to continuous improvement and welcome your feedback.

Complete our online form to be added to our mailing list, or provide general feedback.

Top of page