Biology 2023 HSC exam pack
2023 Biology HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on written exam
Students should:
- read the question carefully to ensure that they do not miss important components of the question
- have a clear understanding of key words in the question and recognise the intent of the question and its requirements
- plan the response to assist in the logical sequencing of information
- integrate relevant scientific terms into their responses
- engage with any stimulus material provided and refer to it in their response
- show all working in calculations and include correct units
- present a logical and succinct response that addresses the question
- review their response to ensure that it addresses the question requirements.
Question 21
In better responses, students were able to:
- correctly identify the three components of a nucleotide
- complete the mRNA strand with the correct complementary bases.
Areas for students to improve include:
- knowing the three components that make up a nucleotide
- knowing that uracil replaces thymine as the complementary base to adenine in RNA.
Question 22(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- describe the action of phagocytes using correct and precise scientific terminology.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using correct and precise scientific terminology. For example, using terms such as ‘engulf’ or ‘enclose’.
Question 22(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a detailed understanding of the steps in the process by which antibodies are produced in response to the entry of a pathogen, including the detection/recognition of antigens, and the production of antibodies by plasma B cells
- distinguish the roles of the various cells involved, including antigen-presenting cells, helper T cells and plasma B cells.
Areas for students to improve include:
- distinguishing between the antibody mediated response and the cell-mediated response, including the cells involved in each
- providing a logical and sequential explanation of the steps involved in antibody production.
Question 23
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate their understanding of the function of different pregnancy hormones using the correct biological terms
- interpret the graph to identify peaks in specific hormones.
Areas for students to improve include:
- identifying trends in graphs
- using correct biological terminology.
Question 24(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- name a particular visual disorder
- identify the parts of the eye involved in the visual disorder
- link the altered structure of the eye to the change in its function.
Areas for students to improve include:
- identifying the parts of the eye involved in a specific visual disorder
- understanding how a change in structure results in a change in function.
Question 24(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide accurate characteristics and features of a technology involved in the treatment of a named visual disorder
- identify the impact on vision when using the technology.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using appropriate technologies specific for the named disorder
- describing both the steps involved and how the technology is used in the treatment of the disorder
- identifying the impact on vision when using the technology.
Question 25(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- show that individual H could only be heterozygous with the use of a Punnett square or describing the phenotypes of their offspring.
Areas for students to improve include:
- identifying all possible genotypes on a pedigree to determine the genotype of individual H
- understanding the difference between autosomal and sex-linked inheritance and dominant and recessive inheritance patterns.
Question 25(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- use the information provided in the stimulus to correctly identify the amino acid.
Areas for students to improve include:
- reading the stimulus material and not transcribing the mRNA sequence before interpreting the codon chart.
Question 25(c)
In better responses, students were able to:
- relate the number of CAG repeats as the determining factor for the age of onset of Huntington’s disease and use data from the graph or the stimulus to support their response.
Areas for students to improve include:
- identifying the independent variable on the x-axis and the dependent variable on the y-axis and using the terminology from the stimulus. For example, ‘age of onset of Huntington's disease’ rather than ‘age’
- using data and stimulus material to explain the relationship between variables.
Question 25(d)
In better responses, students were able to:
- use data from more than one diagram presented to correctly predict the outcome for both individuals.
Areas for students to improve include:
- linking the relationship between individuals to the number of CAG repeats shared to predict the age of onset.
Question 26(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- recognise that the dependent variable was obtained from the results table. For example, ‘number of times mosquitos landed on clothing’, rather than ‘transmission of malaria’
- identify a single example of a controlled variable linked to the experiment.
Areas for students to improve include:
- providing sufficient detail for controlled variables. For example, size of the container rather than just the container
- correctly following directions provided by the question. For example, providing a single example of each variable, instead of multiple variables.
Question 26(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- use trends in the data to draw conclusions about how the cleanliness of the clothes impacted transmission of malaria
- use quantitative measures to justify their conclusion. For example, total or average times landed for each group
- annotate the table to indicate status of container. For example, Container A = infected and dirty, Container B = uninfected and dirty.
Areas for students to improve include:
- linking their conclusion to the aim of the experiment, that is, whether clean clothing reduces the transmission of malaria
- interpreting quantitative data to understand the significance of results. For example, the difference between the averages of container A and C were significant.
Question 27
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a good understanding of the features of an epidemiological study
- identify invalid features of the study
- make the correct judgement about the study’s validity based on the analysis.
Areas for students to improve include:
- engaging directly with the feature of the study in the stimulus provided
- using several features to support the analysis of the study
- making a clear and correct judgement.
Question 28
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify a clear distinguishing feature between a virus and bacteria
- use a table to compare features
- outline a relevant procedure which could be used to distinguish between a virus and a bacteria and outline the results expected for each pathogen.
Areas for students to improve include:
- outlining specific features of viruses and bacteria which help to distinguish them
- comparing one of the distinguishing features rather than only listing features
- outlining the expected results from a procedure that can be used to distinguish viruses from bacteria.
Question 29(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- outline a physiological adaptation in endotherms.
Areas for students to improve include:
- understanding the difference between physiological, behavioural and structural adaptations.
Question 29(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- link cause and effect to show how adaptations of plants assist in the maintenance of water balance.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring that the response includes details of the adaptation, how, and why the adaptation functions the way it does.
Question 30
In better responses, students were able to:
- make a judgement about the vaccination schedule which is supported by the data and the information provided
- show a comprehensive understanding of what a vaccine is and what it does in the body
- interpret the graph and clearly link the data to show that the increased number of booster shots leads to longer lasting immunity.
Areas for students to improve include:
- stating a judgement rather than describing the graph
- providing sufficient information to show correct understanding of what vaccines are and how they work
- using all of the stimulus material provided, not just the information in the graph.
Question 31
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate their knowledge of a genetic technology
- correctly use biological terminology to describe the process of a genetic technology
- use an appropriate medical application that aligns with their genetic technology.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using relevant terminology specific to genetic technologies
- demonstrating a clear understanding of the techniques of genetic technologies
- selecting an appropriate medical application relevant to their genetic technologies.
Question 32
In better responses, students were able to:
- explain both the impact of bushfires and the introduction of male possums on both the population size and gene pool
- use correct terminology including genetic drift (bottleneck effect) and gene flow
- provide a judgement on the impact of bushfires and the introduction of male possums on both the population size and the gene pool
- use data from the stimulus to support the judgement.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using scientific knowledge and terminology to explain the trends and patterns identified in the stimulus
- engaging with all stimulus materials provided in the question.
Question 33
In better responses, students were able to:
- interpret the stimulus to recognise more than one difference between humans and generalised fungi. For example fungi utilise sexual and asexual reproduction while humans undergo sexual reproduction only
- interpret the stimulus to recognise more than one similarity between humans and generalised fungi. For example, meiosis is used in reproduction in both species to produce gametes in humans and spores in fungi
- demonstrate an understanding of stimulus by linking a process to an outcome, rather than simply listing common features. For example, meiosis is used to produce gametes.
Areas for students to improve include:
- translating information contained within the stimulus into a range of unique similarities and differences
- demonstrating an understanding of reproduction in both humans and generalised fungi, not just writing the stimulus without elaboration. For example, ‘meiosis is used to produce gametes in humans and spores in fungi’, rather than ‘both use meiosis’.
Question 34
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate an extensive understanding of the biotechnologies provided in the table
- provide a judgement about how each biotechnology can increase, decrease and maintain biodiversity in cattle
- use specific information from the table provided to support their judgement
- use correct and precise biological terminology to show a depth of understanding.
Areas for students to improve include:
- communicating their understanding in a concise manner to write a planned and structured response
- using examples provided in the table to form judgements, rather than their own examples
- linking the biotechnology to its effect on biodiversity, rather than its effect on the organism.
Question 35
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify a point or substitution mutation
- demonstrate how a change in the DNA sequence results in a different protein with a new shape and different function
- describe in detail several ways a point mutation can affect protein synthesis.
Areas for students to improve include:
- expressing and sequencing the correct steps involved in protein synthesis
- linking changes in the base sequence to the shape of protein which in turn results in a change in function of the protein
- analysing and engaging with the stimulus material provided.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Biology syllabus
Find out more about the Biology syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.