English Studies 2020 HSC exam pack
2020 English Studies HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on written exam
Question 1
In better responses students were able to:
- provide an effective explanation of how visual techniques have been used to represent an idea such as unity or connection through the variety of food types and colours
- select appropriate references from the text to support their ideas.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring they explain, rather than describe, details of the text
- making explicit references to visual features and how they demonstrate specific human experiences.
Question 2
In better responses students were able to:
- clearly explain how the reader is drawn into the experience by the introduction
- make a connection between sharing food and its ability to be ‘nourishing and nurturing’
- provide relevant references from the text.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring they explain clearly how the reader is drawn in through the use of specific language forms and features
- selecting appropriate references from the text which include the reader in the experience.
Question 3
In better responses students were able to:
- provide an effective explanation showing how exploring place can be mysterious and uncertain
- select appropriate references from the text to support their explanation.
Areas for students to improve include:
- avoiding merely describing the image provided with the poem
- explaining how the forms and features of the poem demonstrate human experiences such as discovery and reflection.
Students should:
- respond explicitly to the question, ensuring that all elements are addressed in a balanced and consistent manner
- develop a deep understanding of their prescribed text
- demonstrate understanding of the prescribed text through evidence and examples from across the text, judiciously selected to support their argument
- organise and structure a cohesive argument
- compose a sustained, cohesive and structured response with controlled expression, purposeful and evaluative language and an authentic voice.
In better responses, students were able to:
- purposefully address the key terms of the question in a consistent and balanced way
- build a convincing thesis that evaluated how stories effectively reveal the shared and personal nature of experiences
- consider how the textual form, features and language of the prescribed text are used to tell stories and reveal meaning
- explain how the audience is positioned by the text’s construction, with particular consideration of form and genre.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring they respond to the full scope of the question
- developing a line of argument that deliberately addresses the specific elements of the question without relying on generic statements from the module description
- evaluating the author’s intent and the effect of their compositional choices on the audience
- analysing, rather than describing, how the text has been composed
- using the metalanguage of form.
Students should:
- address all parts of the question
- demonstrate understanding of a significant issue through explicit discussion of a module and text studied
- write a structured response, appropriate to audience and purpose.
In better responses, students were able to:
- explicitly and clearly discuss the issue studied and the extent to which this study allowed for a rethinking of the issue
- establish a clear line of argument which was maintained throughout the response
- provide explicit and varied examples of textual evidence to support their argument.
Areas for students to improve include:
- providing responses that offer a more detailed discussion of the question
- writing with increased specificity, rather than making vague or general statements
- taking care with control of language.
Students should:
- engage with the stimulus provided
- show an awareness of form – imaginative, reflective or persuasive.
In better responses, students were able to:
- effectively engage with the stimulus in a way that went beyond interpretation
- successfully use the elements of the chosen form
- use language in a well-developed and coherent way.
Areas for students to improve include:
- engaging with the specific terms of the question
- developing meaningful engagement with the conventions of the chosen form
- composing a controlled and complete response.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
English Studies syllabus
Find out more about the English Studies syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.