French Extension 2022 HSC exam pack
2022 French Extension HSC exam papers
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the examination paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s examination.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future examinations. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical examination
Students should:
- use the seven minutes of preparation time to prepare points which can be used to deliver a logical and coherent monologue
- state the question to which they are responding
- speak for approximately three minutes
- address all parts of the question
- adopt a point of view or stance and provide appropriate examples that link their argument to the question
- avoid solely recounting their own experiences in order to answer the question
- avoid using prepared material that may be irrelevant to the question
- use a variety of vocabulary, sentence structures and expressions which are suitable to the issue addressed in the question
- provide a conclusion that is not a repetition of the introduction.
In better responses, students were able to:
- establish their main argument(s) in the introduction before proceeding to the body of the discussion and unpacking all parts of the question
- provide relevant examples in a logical manner and link them back to the question
- provide a concise summary of their main argument(s) in the conclusion
- use expressions such as, à la fin de cette analyse, de prime abord, en premier lieu … en deuxième lieu, néanmoins, je ne suis pas entièrement convaincu(e) de cette thèse, après avoir fait cette enquête
- discuss how challenges in life help, or do not help, us to better understand who we are (Q1)
- use sophisticated vocabulary and expressions, such as, on construit son identité à travers les défis, tout porte à croire que les défis sont essentiels pour découvrir qui on est (Q1)
- define les défis and what it means to know who we are to better understand ourselves (Q1)
- discuss how money is, or is not, sufficient to overcome difficulties in life (Q2)
- define what type of difficulties individuals experience in life (Q2)
- use sophisticated vocabulary and expressions, such as, cet exemple affirme que les relations familiales sont plus importantes (Q2).
Areas for students to improve include:
- fully explaining ideas rather than stating facts
- making explicit links of how the examples provided answer the question
- avoiding the pronunciation of the last letters of words, such as, impact, succès
- avoidingmispronunciation of words, suchas, aident, obstacle
- ensuring agreement of adjectives, such as, une personne différente
- avoiding anglicisms such as challenge/focuser/confusé
- ensuring that the arguments are well developed and there is an equal amount of time allocated to each argument
- ensuring that there is sufficient time for a conclusion
- ensuring that the question is being answered rather than going off topic, for example, making the question about resilience rather than a discussion about what students have learned about themselves
- avoiding the use of quotes unless they are well linked to the argument
- keeping to two well-structured arguments is advised
- ensuring the correct use of nouns, for example, lesattentes rather than les expectations and l’argent rather than la monnaie
- ensuring the correct use of pronouns, for example, elle l’a aidé rather than ellelui a aidé.
Feedback on written examination
Students should:
- read the whole extract before attempting to answer the questions
- read the questions carefully and address all aspects in their response
- explain the quotes given in French and their significance in the relevant context rather than just translating them
- demonstrate knowledge of all the extracts for study and the whole prescribed text where required
- respond in English using their own words
- use the lines given as an indication of the length of response required.
In better responses, students were able to:
- respond to the question using succinct, substantial and relevant detail with clear examples
- understand that on this evening Philippe was restless and in pain so Driss takes him out for a walk (Q1a)
- translate or paraphrase the quote accurately and refer to the fact that Philippe was raised to look down on others (Q1b)
- understand that Philippe no longer believes himself superior to others because of Driss’s influence – it is not his accident or disability which has stopped him feeling superior (Q1b)
- identify and articulate the great depth of Philippe’s love for Alice and his deep grief over her death (Q1c).
Areas for students to improve include:
- answering concisely and to the point
- quoting the text in English rather than French
- using the content of the script rather than cinematographic evidence to provide examples
- avoiding repetition of content, that is, reusing information from Q1c to answer Q1d
- linking quotes to the issue of acceptance (Q1d).
Students should:
- address all parts of the question
- write in the type of text as specified in the question
- address the specified purpose, context and audience of the question
- write from a particular perspective as required by the question
- demonstrate their knowledge of the chosen extract and other relevant parts of the text when responding to the question
- support their response with evidence from the text
- use their own words and avoid translating the text as part of their response.
In better responses, students were able to:
- select appropriate elements of the text on which to elaborate
- avoid simply recounting knowledge of facts without linking them to the task requirements
- stay true to the voice of the character by using respectful banter
- explain why the letter was written (a new job)
- show reflection on, and provide clear examples of, how Philippe has influenced Driss’s life, for example, a reference to his love of art
- use the correct address for character interaction, vous (formal ‘you’) instead of tu (informal ‘you’)
- show consistency in language manipulation.
Areas for students to improve include:
- keeping to the specified text type and observing letter conventions, such as the address, date, greeting, paragraphing and sign-off
- addressing all aspects of the question, for example, that Driss is reflecting on the conversation from a later time
- referencing the quote given from the extract in a purposeful way and following task instructions when incorporating it.
Students should:
- address all aspects of the question
- write in the relevant text type required by the question
- use the appropriate register throughout the response
- ensure that the content of their response is relevant to the question
- plan and sequence their response to ensure that it is coherent
- demonstrate knowledge of vocabulary, expressions and, where relevant, idiomatic language related to the issues prescribed for study
- support their argument, point of view or opinion with relevant ideas and information
- manipulate the language authentically and creatively with the correct use of grammar and syntax to meet the requirements of the task
- use the dictionary to choose the appropriate word, expression or phrase for the context, purpose and audience of the question
- ensure that there is enough time to edit their work.
In better responses, students were able to:
- address the intended audience (young people) throughout their response, for example, en tant que jeunes (as young people)
- support their arguments with examples from contemporary society outside their personal world
- make explicit links on how their arguments and the examples provided answer the question
- structure their response with a clear introduction outlining their argument and a thoughtful conclusion
- use authentic and sophisticated expressions related to the prescribed issues.
Areas for students to improve include:
- writing a title and subtitles (as the text type required was an article) and using paragraphs
- avoiding using the pronoun je (I), as this was an article and not a speech
- consistently linking the argument and examples back to the question
- avoiding personal anecdotes without clear links to how this extends to a broader truth or to young people in general
- ensuring correct grammar, conjugation, gender and prepositions
- ensuring correct spelling.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
French Extension syllabus
Find out more about the French Extension syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.