Latin Continuers 2019 HSC exam pack
2019 Latin Continuers HSC exam papers
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the examination paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows each question and the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the link(s) below to view feedback about how students performed in this year’s examination.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future examinations. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on written examination
General feedback for Sections I and II – Prescribed Text
Students should:
- look carefully at the marks allocated to a question as they indicate the depth and length of response required
- provide succinct responses to short-answer questions
- address all elements of a commentary question in a logical and cohesive manner, focusing only on relevant information
- avoid overly long, rehearsed and largely irrelevant introductions and conclusions
- support their explanation or analysis with relevant and specific examples, explaining the link between the examples given and the aspect being analysed
- use ellipsis when quoting more than a few words from an extract, for example, quae… coniunx in order to avoid copying long sections of text
- demonstrate in English their understanding of how the Latin is relevant to their argument, and not leave sections of quoted Latin text to speak for itself
- avoid commenting on punctuation in the Latin text
- provide translations of prescribed texts that are coherent and fluent and make sense in English
- check their translations to ensure that no words or phrases have been accidentally omitted.
Prescribed Text
Question 1
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide a contextually appropriate translation for absentibus notus, praetextatus and Dedit [sic].
Areas for students to improve include:
- differentiating between the various uses of cum.
Question 2
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify significant word placement and link it to Cicero’s presentation of Grattius’ expectations (Q2aii)
- distinguish between the Papian and the Papirian law (Q2bii)
- explain clearly how the rhetorical techniques strengthened Cicero’s assertion, rather than just stating that they did (Q2biii).
Areas for students to improve include:
- knowing the context of an extract and any cultural or historical references in it (Q2bii)
- focusing on the specified number of techniques required by the question, rather than outlining several (Q2biii).
Question 3
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify and focus on several of Cicero’s arguments in the extract
- make judicious, selective use of a variety of rhetorical techniques to support their response rather than writing about them as separate points.
Areas for students to improve include:
- analysing the extract provided rather than quoting secondary literature as evidence
- focusing on the extract provided and not repeating generalised statements about the remainder of the speech.
Prescribed Text
Question 4
In better responses, students were able to:
- deal effectively with the syntax of lines 394-396
- recognise the function of ut in line 397.
Areas for students to improve include:
- differentiating between the various uses of ut
- accounting for every word in their translation, avoiding careless omissions: for example, hinc (389), videntur (396).
Question 5
In better responses, students were able to:
- express concisely the link between two stylistic devices and Aeolus’ subservience (Q5aiii)
- recognise elision between a word ending with –m and the next one starting with –h, for example, animam hanc (Q5bi)
- link clearly the literary techniques to Aeneas’ emotions, rather than listing them with little explanation (Q5bii).
Areas for students to improve include:
- differentiating in scansion between diphthongs and two adjacent vowels constituting separate quantities (Q5bi)
- focusing on the requirements of the question and not writing extensively about general themes such as Aeneas’ pietas or furor (Q5bii).
Question 6
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify and focus on significant elements of Virgil’s portrayal of the gods
- draw out the implications behind the words of each of the gods who are speaking
- make appropriate links and comparisons between the speeches.
Areas for students to improve include:
- providing a balanced response and not focusing largely on one aspect of the prescribed focus area or question (for example, a particular god) at the expense of other significant points
- avoiding making stylistic analysis the focus of their response, regardless of the question
- avoiding irrelevant references to epic in general.
Unseen Texts
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide a contextually appropriate translation for eo solum vertunt (Q7)
- recognise the grammatical function of ut in ut apud ceteras civitates (Q7)
- identify legis as a noun (Q8a)
- recognise and translate accordingly the agreements in lines 148-149 (Q9)
- translate correctly satus Anchisa in line 152 (Q9)
- identify ellipsis of the verb and substitute a suitable verb in their translation (Q9).
Areas for students to improve include:
- examining a Latin word in the context of the extract before determining its grammatical function (Q7,8a,9)
- identifying words in agreement, for example, noun and adjective, noun and participle (Q7,9).
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Latin Continuers Syllabus
Find out more about the Latin Continuers syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.