Latin Continuers 2020 HSC exam pack
2020 Latin Continuers HSC exam papers
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the examination paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows each question and the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the link(s) below to view feedback about how students performed in this year’s examination.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future examinations. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on written examination
General feedback for Sections I and II – Prescribed Text
Students should:
- look carefully at the marks allocated to a question as they indicate the depth and length of response required
- provide succinct responses to short-answer questions
- address all elements of a commentary question in a logical and cohesive manner, focusing only on relevant information
- avoid overly long, rehearsed and largely irrelevant introductions and conclusions
- support their explanation or analysis with relevant and specific examples, explaining the link between the examples given and the aspect being analysed
- use ellipsis when quoting more than a few words from an extract, for example, et testamentum… delatus est in order to avoid copying long sections of text
- explain in English how the Latin is relevant to their argument, and not leave sections of quoted Latin text to speak for itself
- avoid commenting on punctuation in the Latin text
- provide translations of prescribed texts that are coherent and fluent
- check their translations to ensure that words or phrases have not been omitted.
Prescribed Text
Question 1
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide a correct and contextually appropriate translation for rebus,and for the demonstrative pronouns and adjectives huius, illi, illum
- recognise honos as a nominative singular
- provide a translation which was sensitive to the author’s manipulation of word order to give emphasis.
Areas for students to improve include:
- developing a more precise understanding of pronouns.
Question 2
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify three clear rhetorical techniques and explain how each one emphasises the value of literature (aiii)
- go beyond outlining the historical background to explain clearly how the historical exempla assist Cicero’s defence (bii).
Areas for students to improve include:
- focusing on the specified number of techniques required by the question, rather than outlining several (aiii)
- knowing the context of an extract and any cultural or historical references in it (bii)
- developing an understanding of the significance of cultural or historical references in their context (bii).
Question 3
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify different aspects of Cicero’s portrayal of Archias in the extracts
- link Cicero’s portrayal of Archias to their argument
- make judicious, selective use of a variety of methods used by Cicero to support their response
- provide a balanced response, drawing examples from both extracts.
Areas for students to improve include:
- moving beyond mere description of Archias to an analysis
- focusing on the key requirements of the question, in this case the portrayal of Archias and Cicero’s argument
- ensuring that comments about Cicero’s language and style are used to support the response and do not become its focus.
Prescribed Text
Question 4
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide accurate and contextually appropriate translations for Corripuere viam [sic] (418), qui plurimus urbi imminet (419-20), strata viarum (422), ardentes (423)
- provide different synonyms for viam and semita (418), respecting the use of two different nouns in the Latin text
- recognise that hic (427) is an adverb.
Areas for students to improve include:
- accounting for every word in their translation, avoiding careless omissions: for example, interea (418), desuper (420), alii (427-8).
Question 5
In better responses, students were able to:
- outline the four causes of Juno’s hostility and not just translate the text (aii)
- recognise elision between a word ending with –m and the next one starting with a vowel, for example fugientem est (bi)
- identify different aspects of the relationship between Aeneas and his mother (bii)
- select three clear examples of Virgil’s use of language and link them to the depiction of the relationship (bii).
Areas for students to improve include:
- developing a clear understanding of the difference between identify, outline and explain (aii)
- focusing on the specified number of examples or items required by the question, rather than outlining several or responding in general terms (aii, bii)
- becoming more familiar with the scansion rules for elision and for the treatment of two vowels next to each other (bi).
Question 6
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify and focus on significant elements of Virgil’s depiction of the character of Dido
- draw out the implications behind the words of the two narrators
- make appropriate links and comparisons between the aspects of Dido’s character that are revealed in the extracts.
Areas for students to improve include:
- providing a balanced response and not focusing largely on one aspect of the character
- not making stylistic analysis the focus of their response, regardless of the question
- avoiding irrelevant references to other characters, for example, Pygmalion.
Unseen Texts
In better responses, students were able to:
- recognise that nihil is the object of habet (Q7)
- recognise and translate accordingly the impersonal construction nobis interdictum sit with ne and the subjunctive (Q7)
- recognise the agreement of dissidentem and coniunctam with gentem (Q7)
- recognise that praeclara and comparata agree with iura (Q8a)
- identify dissimilitudo as the subject of habeat (Q8b)
- translate visa correctly as a main verb in line 637 (Q9)
- recognise the alternative accusative plural -IS ending of puppis in line 635 and ardentis in line 637 (Q9)
- identify ellipsis of the verb and substitute with a suitable verb in their translation (Q9)
- understand that maxima natu in line 644 refers to age (Q10)
- identify eunti in line 649 as a present participle (Q10).
Areas for students to improve include:
- developing effective dictionary skills (Q7, Q9)
- examining carefully the context of a Latin word in the extract before determining its grammatical function (Q7, Q8c, Q9, Q10b)
- identifying words in agreement, for example, noun and adjective, noun and participle (Q7, Q9)
- focusing on the continuity of the text to keep track of what is happening (Q7, Q8d, Q9, Q10a, d).
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Latin Continuers Syllabus
Find out more about the Latin Continuers syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.