Modern Greek Continuers 2015 HSC exam pack
2015 Modern Greek Continuers HSC exam papers
Modern Greek Continuers HSC exam paper 2015 – Audio
Section I – Listening and responding
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the examination paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s examination.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future examinations. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical examination
Characteristics of better responses:
- language was manipulated effectively in response to a range of questions
- an excellent knowledge of vocabulary and language structures with a high level of grammatical accuracy was demonstrated
- a range of questions that included recall/informational, comparative, hypothetical and reflective were addressed well
- opinions were justified effectively.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- language was not manipulated effectively and sentences were often incomplete
- language structures were used with inaccuracies in grammar and syntax
- articles, cases and tenses were used incorrectly.
Feedback on written examination
Characteristics of better responses:
- a good understanding of the speaker’s perception of the relationship with his audience was demonstrated (Q4)
- a good understanding of the escalating change in the mother’s attitude to her son’s behaviour was demonstrated (Q5)
- how Anna conveyed her feelings, incorporating textual evidence was demonstrated (Q6)
- the purpose of the speaker was identified and an understanding of how it was achieved was demonstrated (Q7)
- a comprehensive understanding of the reasons the speaker was invited on the radio program was demonstrated and supported with references to the text (Q8).
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- a translation was provided without interpreting and evaluating information
- appropriate language techniques and references to the text were not provided (Q6 and Q7)
- generic responses did not address the questions effectively.
Characteristics of better responses:
- an understanding of language techniques such as pun/metaphor (Q9a) and tone, such as sarcastic/condescending/patronising (Q9c) were demonstrated
- appropriate examples with clear links to the question were provided to demonstrate how language is used (Q10e)
- a comprehensive understanding of the key issues in the text was demonstrated.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- a global understanding of the passage was not evident and a translation rather than an interpretation was provided (Q9a and Q9d)
- the literal and metaphorical interpretations of οδηγούν were not identified (Q9a)
- the story was re-told rather than addressing how language is used (Q10e)
- a valid discussion about language was not developed
- techniques were listed (at times incorrectly) without providing appropriate examples as support.
Characteristics of better responses:
- most points were well developed and with some degree of creativity
- grammatical accuracy was demonstrated with only some minor errors
- correct text type was used and ideas were well structured.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- some of the questions, statements and specific information from the stimulus text were addressed
- some understanding of the text was demonstrated but with limited development of ideas
- frequent errors in language structures (verbs, agreement) and use of anglicisms were evident.
Characteristics of better responses:
- a very good understanding of the audience, purpose and context of the task was demonstrated
- an excellent understanding of language structures relevant to the task was demonstrated
- ideas and information were structured effectively
- correct text type was used.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- some information, opinion or ideas relevant to the task were presented
- a rudimentary understanding of vocabulary and sentence structures was demonstrated by:
- inaccurate use of cases
- lack of agreement between article-noun and noun-adjective
- inaccurate formation of active and passive verbs
- confusion in writing accurately some Greek characters, in particular δ, θ, ψ, π, μ.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Modern Greek Continuers syllabus
Find out more about the Modern Greek Continuers syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.