Society and Culture 2017 HSC exam pack
2017 Society and Culture HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical exam
Students should:
- ensure that their PIP topic has a direct relationship to the Society and Culture course
- move beyond description of an issue and analyse research results in relation to the implications of the results
- make clear and detailed judgements related to the usefulness, bias, reliability and validity of each primary and secondary source
- ensure that the log has sufficient detail on the research conducted and includes critical reflection that leads to subsequent research actions
- demonstrate clarity of the hypothesis and a concise focus
- demonstrate genuine research methods that provide data to correlate secondary evidence
- avoid lengthy description and lengthy quotes that are not analysed
- apply social and cultural research methods appropriately to the area of research
- reference sources correctly to avoid plagiarism
- structure paragraphs to communicate ideas effectively
- choose topics which enable authentic research that allows for evidence of personal experience and public knowledge
- apply ethical considerations to topic choice and research methods
- ensure that any theorists or theories are appropriate for their topic and effective in expanding upon understandings and findings
- ensure that any images/figures or graphs are labelled and effectively referred to in text.
In the better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a strong connection to personal experience that is appropriately connected to substantial public knowledge
- apply appropriate theories to further develop ideas
- successfully integrate primary and secondary research into discussion within the Central Material and correctly reference and use this to demonstrate the integration of secondary and primary sources
- integrate complex concepts and demonstrate their interrelationship
- demonstrate a high standard of academic research with a uniqueness of topic, design or execution
- provide evidence of an effective research process, integrating both their primary and secondary research findings with appropriate writing, editing and synthesis
- derive a conceptually driven PIP topic from the interrelationships within and between concepts
- correctly reference sources with reflective annotations
- apply images, graphs and/or tables to enhance communication
- make informed judgements that are reflective of their research findings
- critically reflect on research methods across all sections of the PIP
- draw on contemporary issues, enabling relevancy and critical analysis
- use citations throughout the central material to demonstrate highly effective communication
- provide implications of the research which is then applied conceptually to what this might mean for wider society
- consistently apply social and cultural research methods with a balanced integration between primary and secondary sources, allowing for correlation of data
- clearly integrate a cross-cultural component, along with continuity and change.
Feedback on written exam
Students should:
- present a well-organised and well-structured response that applies course-specific language
- integrate a range of appropriate and specific examples to support judgements
- effectively apply course concepts
- organise a clear and well-constructed, logical and cohesive response that maintains judgements throughout
- create a logical flow of ideas
- structure responses to demonstrate a sustained argument that clearly answers the question
- avoid narrative and description
- use the number of lines provided
- address the key concepts in the question and apply them accurately.
Students should expect:
- questions from any part of the syllabus
- to apply their focus studies as a framework within which to answer the question
- to integrate the knowledge, understanding and skills developed through studying the course across each question
- to answer both Part A and B for both of their depth studies.
Students can prepare for this examination by:
- ensuring their focus studies in each depth study cover all relevant syllabus dot points in sufficient detail to complete a sustained argument
- practising past HSC papers in the allocated 2 hour time period
- applying the fundamental concepts and specific depth study concepts to each dot point in the syllabus
- ensuring they have a contemporary example that is relevant to each section of the syllabus.
In better responses, students were able to:
- address all the dimensions or parts of the question
- demonstrate social and cultural literacy engage with the key words to clearly answer the question
- present a well-organised response that applies contemporary examples.
General feedback
In better responses, students were able to:
- answer the question succinctly
- provide clear examples to support the application of the course concepts.
Question 9
In better responses, students were able to:
- accurately identify two characteristics of quantitative research
- provide characteristics and examples drawn from quantitative research
- present two different characteristics of quantitative research.
Question 10
In better responses, students were able to:
- apply an accurate understanding of power in a country
- provide specific features and characteristics of power
- distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate power
- make clear and concise alignments of power to the country using contemporary examples.
Question 11
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify a correct syllabus-based social change theory
- apply their understanding of the theory to social change
- explicitly state the country they are using in the response
- support the response with relevant, contemporary, and specific examples that directly relate to one of the listed aspects.
General feedback
In better responses, students were able to:
- address all parts of the question in a sustained, logical and coherent manner, rather than providing a narrative or descriptive response
- identify a contemporary issue that relates to their focus study
- connect the issue to the use of the research method
- choose and apply appropriate course concepts to their response
- make a judgement that links to the evidence to demonstrate knowledge of the course content
- apply Society and Culture concepts and course-specific language such as conflict, dissent, globalisation, technologies, continuity and change.
Question 12(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- clearly demonstrate their understanding of a contemporary issue in popular culture through the application of content analysis; these responses demonstrate a strong understanding of the prescribed research method
- provide responses that demonstrate a discussion of a range of appropriate contemporary issues and examples
- show why content analysis is appropriate and how this method would be applied/conducted.
Question 12(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- make informed judgements on the role gender construction and/or deconstruction plays in the global acceptance of a popular culture
- apply appropriate examples drawn from a genre listed in the syllabus and from contemporary society.
Question 13
In better responses, students were able to:
- refer to specific belief systems, such as Buddhism, Islam and Hinduism; or Ideologies such as feminism, democracy or environmentalism.
Question 13(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a detailed understanding of interview as a research method
- refer to characteristics of the interview method such as being qualitative and time-consuming in nature
- demonstrate how the data collected from interview could be used and analysed within the belief system/ideology
- address the ethical implications and validity of the interview as a method of research.
Question 13(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- recall core elements of stories and myths of the belief system/ideology while connecting to the wider society
- apply specific examples and accurate details to support points rather than just presenting the narratives surrounding myths and stories.
Question 14(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a clear understanding of data analysis as a research method and how it could be used to investigate a contemporary issue
- apply the features of data analysis to demonstrate an understanding of how it can be used to investigate an issue.
Question 14(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a clear and explicit understanding of the importance of both employment and the social justice system as socially valued resources for the inclusion of one group in one country
- demonstrate knowledge of the significance of both employment and the social justice system to society
- choose appropriate examples to integrate into the response and link these strongly to employment and the social justice system.
Question 15(a)
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify a contemporary issue associated with social conformity and nonconformity
- demonstrate knowledge of the research method of observation
- address the way the research method of observation could be used, using a specific example.
Question 15(b)
In better responses, students were able to:
- organise their response effectively by applying appropriate example(s) to support an understanding of the links between the role of status and responsibility in defining identity
- integrate examples from one sub-cultural group, for example, Christiania and the Amish, that support the defining of identity
- apply course concepts to demonstrate knowledge of the course content and the links between status, responsibility and identity, for example, official and unofficial leadership
- sustain judgements throughout the response to demonstrate the relationship between the sub-culture group, course concepts and the focus of the question
- clarify the specific group they are studying, for example, Western Sydney Wanderers
- engage with the key words in the question – role of status and responsibility in defining identity.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Society and Culture syllabus
Find out more about the Society and Culture syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.