Society and Culture 2019 HSC exam pack
2019 Society and Culture HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical exam
Students should:
- clearly state the topic and hypothesis for investigation in the introduction
- ensure the topic choice is sociological in its nature
- establish the cross-cultural perspective and scope of continuity and/or change
- focus on the conceptual relevancy of the topic
- make a clear relationship between personal knowledge and public knowledge evident
- make evident the social and/or cultural significance of the topic
- adhere to the Personal Interest Project requirements regarding word limits.
In better projects, students were able to:
- develop topics and ideas that allow for appropriate and comprehensive exploration of the implications for all levels of society
- demonstrate cohesion between focus areas to ensure that chapters don't address ideas in isolation
- justify the contemporary relevance of a topic
- evaluate their research methods to validate the process of their research
- explain reasons for the chosen research methods and engage with validity/bias
- engage with the ethical practices of research (pages 21 of the Syllabus)
- demonstrate a high level of social and cultural literacy in their topic choice
- select a topic that provides enough scope for the development and application of course concepts and appropriate research methods.
Students should:
- further develop their personal connection to the topic
- critically reflect on the limits and challenges of research methods
- highlight the relationship between research findings and new paths of inquiry
- critically examine the sample demographics in relation to the validity of data
- reflect on the ‘Process of Research’ steps from pages 22-23 of the syllabus
- avoid diary entry formats or narrative tone.
In better projects, students were able to:
- identify specific forms of research appropriate to the development of their project
- reflect on the usefulness, validity and/or bias of sources
- account for the challenges in the Personal Interest Project and how they overcame these issues
- focus on the decision making process in relation to their research and topic development
- specify any ethical considerations relevant to the topic
- discuss the parameters of their topic
- demonstrate a conceptual overview of the process.
Students should:
- establish a context for inquiry through a synthesis of primary and secondary data concerning the need for sociological inquiry into the topic
- avoid using secondary research as a description of the topic
- use primary research to account for micro interpretations of macro issues
- avoid an historical, narrative recount
- integrate cross-cultural comparisons throughout
- identify the continuity and changes across micro, meso and macro levels and analyse these changes within the framework of course concepts
- sustain engagement with the hypothesis
- reflect on the limitations of research and validity
- develop deep analysis and cohesive arguments by not segmenting the central material into small parts
- consider where to appropriately integrate graphic forms.
In better projects, students were able to:
- make meaningful reference to visual sources, including pictures or graphs
- appropriately integrate personal experience
- effectively apply complex, academic language to succinctly express ideas
- provide a clear and thorough synthesis and critical analysis of their findings
- demonstrate a balance of primary and secondary research
- apply a high standard of authoritative research and connect this to the hypothesis
- succinctly acknowledge the reliability/validity/bias of primary or secondary material
- integrate their research effectively
- make sophisticated judgements consistently throughout
- explain the conceptual implication within a sociological framework
- integrate a range a perspectives to ensure a depth of research
- demonstrate an accurate and appropriate understanding of their chosen research method, for example, focus group, content analysis.
Students should:
- return to the hypothesis and original goals as outlined in the introduction
- apply course concepts to account for conclusions
- avoid repeating introduction or re-stating conclusions from Central Material
- express the extent to which their hypothesis was confirmed or challenged
- reflect on how the project has explicitly developed their social and cultural literacy rather than using a dot point from page 25 of the syllabus
- evaluate the process of their research in relation to their growth as a researcher
- analyse, rather than summarise their findings.
In better projects, students were able to:
- consider the social and/or cultural implications for the research findings
- reflect on the research process
- make a judgement that is reflective and linked to their hypothesis
- derive their conclusions based on genuine evidence conducted through the Personal Interest Project process
- show critical reflection and evaluation of their hypothesis and research.
Students should:
- accurately reference sources (Assessment and Reporting page 12)
- critically reflect on how research methods supported the construction of the Personal Interest Project.
In better projects, students were able to:
- reflect on the use of sources through the consideration of reliability, validity and bias
- explain the way in which the research contributed to the project
- reflect on primary and secondary research methods.
Feedback on written exam
Students should:
- understand the key words of the question
- integrate relevant society and culture terminology into responses
- use the reading time effectively to plan their responses
- plan their extended responses on the lined section of the answer booklet with the heading ‘plan’
- provide a logical and cohesive response using appropriate society and culture information, ideas concepts and statistics
- provide examples, where appropriate, to support their response
- draw on conceptually driven knowledge to respond to the question, demonstrating both depth and range of course understanding
- be mindful of the suggested word length and achieve a flow of connected ideas.
Question 9
In better responses, students were able to:
- clearly identify a theory
- demonstrate how that theory explains social and cultural continuity
- support the response with relevant and specific examples that effectively show continuity
- integrate appropriate concepts and language.
Areas for students to improve include:
- selecting an appropriate theory that can be applied to continuity
- integrating an example of continuity rather than an example of change and forcing it to suit the question.
Question 10
In better responses, students were able to:
- explicitly identify a tradition within one country
- qualify the rate and change, for example, moving towards, slowly, rapidly, increased by, transformative, evolutionary
- support the response with relevant and specific examples that demonstrated the role of tradition
- integrate other appropriate concepts, such as westernisation, society, culture, globalisation, change.
Areas for students to improve include:
- avoiding a narrative about change in a country
- applying appropriate examples to help gain clarity in the response, for example, the use of statistics.
Question 11
In better responses, students were able to:
- show a clear understanding of the ideology of the popular culture and reasons for the rejection of that ideology by specified groups (a)
- apply course concepts and language, for example, beliefs, values, traditions (a)
- apply a range of examples at the micro, meso and macro level (a)
- directly address the question in a well-structured, succinct and cohesive response (a)
- provide a detailed and coherent response that clearly addressed a future or a possible future for each example stakeholder (b)
- apply a range of stakeholders in the response and make a judgement regarding which was more likely to impact the future directions of the popular culture (b)
- explain each stakeholder and their role, for example, Producers, Consumers, Peers/Family, Media, Transnational corporations, Marketing (b)
- apply a wide range of relevant and accurate examples (b)
- use a qualifying term to make an informed judgement about the future, for example, likely, unlikely, possible, probable, trends (b)
- address the implications, both positive and negative, of the potential future (b)
- apply concepts such as micro, meso and macro and successfully integrate a range of examples related to each concept (b)
- integrate contemporary issues and concepts (gender, ethnicity and sustainability in particular) in order to determine potential future directions (b).
Areas for students to improve include:
- using ONE popular culture as opposed to popular culture in general (a)
- establishing the ideology of the popular culture (a)
- identifying the groups and reasons for rejecting the ideology(b)
- sustaining a coherent argument in the introduction and throughout the response
- moving beyond historical narrative of the development of the selected popular culture or of stakeholder or continuities and changes to explicitly address the future directions (b)
- supporting argument with relevant, appropriate and contemporary examples (b).
Question 12
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate the features that distinguish ideologies and belief systems (a)
- present a well-structured explanation that clarifies the link between belief systems and ideologies and contrasting features (a)
- apply specific examples to demonstrate similarities and differences, by providing accurate information about a belief system and ideology(a)
- apply a range of relevant course concepts
- show understanding of the concepts of dissent and internal structure, and make connections between them (b)
- address the impact of dissent on the identified internal structure of one belief system or ideology (b).
Areas for students to improve include:
- avoiding a description of the characteristics of belief systems and/or ideologies (a)
- linking examples of belief systems and ideologies to their explanation (a)
- addressing both the similarities and differences of belief systems and ideologies (a)
- using specific rather than generalised examples
- addressing the impacts, including cause and effect, of dissent on the internal structure of one belief system or ideology (b)
- developing a wider range of examples that can be adapted to support informed judgements (b).
Question 13
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate an understanding of the reasons for a pluralist society and culture, such as globalisation, migration, laws and legislation, human rights, dignity and respect (a)
- provide clear and appropriate examples that are applied specifically to the question (a)
- integrate appropriate conceptual language such as social cohesion, social inclusion and social mobility (a)
- provide detail of social inclusion in ONE country (b)
- make informed judgements about how effective the programs are by applying a range of examples (b)
- integrate conceptual language appropriate to social inclusion such as empowerment, social inclusion and hierarchy (b).
Areas for students to improve include:
- integrating a specific example to support their understanding (a)
- showing appropriate connections between pluralist society and cultures and historical development (a)
- supporting responses with accurate data and utilising examples (b)
- addressing the question, rather than providing a description or historical recount (b)
- creating a logical response through a flow of ideas (b).
- integrating course language relevant to social inclusion and exclusion, for example, ethnicity, social differentiation, human rights, equality (b).
Question 14
In better responses, students were able to:
- show a clear understanding of the role of the media and the process involved in shaping social opinions, for example, through bias reporting (a)
- show an understanding of the power of the media (a)
- draw upon their understanding of agenda setting to explain the role of the media (a)
- clearly articulate attitudes toward nonconformists resulting from media reporting (a)
- demonstrate the cause and effect between the role of the media and the shaping of attitudes through features of their chosen examples (a)
- discuss an appropriate non-conformist group(s) (a)
- use ONE clearly defined group that is non-conformist in nature, such as Christiania, Amish, Sea Shepherd, Survivalists or Brujas (b)
- distinguish between historical and social development (b)
- clearly explore the relationships identified, that is, technology as an agent of change in subculture development consistent (b)
- make appropriate judgements about the role of technology in group development (b)
- differentiate between positive and negative perceptions of the group by the wider society (b).
Areas for students to improve include:
- making a specific link between the role of the media and how attitudes are shaped (a)
- applying an understanding of agenda setting (a)
- applying a range of appropriate related concepts (a)
- structuring the response logically to show why and how (a)
- applying syllabus prescriptions to their choice of a non-conformist group (b)
- identifying the type of technology explored (b)
- demonstrating an understanding of the concepts of cohesion, power and authority in relation to the social development and historical development of one non-conformist group (b)
- integrating relevant examples (b)
- maintaining a focus on how technology has impacted the historical and social development of the group (b)
- considering the wide range of technologies according to the syllabus definition (b)
- separating technology from being synonymous only with media (b)
- avoiding a focus on historical events, such as Jonestown, Branch Davidians, Nimbin Aquarius Festival, in lieu of a non-conformist group (b).
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Society and Culture syllabus
Find out more about the Society and Culture syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.