Dance 2016 HSC exam pack

Core

Characteristics of better responses:

• moving efficiently and safely
• presenting a range of locomotor and non-locomotor sequences and body skills
• performing dances that were suited to their body type and level of skills
• performing skilfully with spatial, temporal and dynamic variations, weight shifts, control of strength and flexibility
• controlling the torso through off-centre movement, balances, changes in direction and weight, and using and manipulating floor skills
• working their anatomical structure appropriately
• maintaining alignment through the correct application of strength balanced against a range of motion
• personalising the dance, manipulating the dynamic and space, and moving from one skill to another with efficiency and control
• cleanly placing and finishing lines, sustaining focus and extending lines and energy.

Characteristics of weaker responses:

• pushing beyond their anatomical limits
• losing control of the torso, leading to a consistent loss of alignment of the hip, torso, knee and foot
• not controlling spatial elements and lack of kinaesthetic awareness
• inconsistencies in the control of movement in transitions between locomotor and non-locomotor movement, in the use and manipulation of weight into and out of the floor, and in kinaesthetic awareness in completion of turns, finishing body lines in the upper and lower body, and projection.

Major study

Characteristics of better responses:

• demonstrating a strong relationship between the execution of technique and the application of the elements of dance to achieve the interpretation of the thematic consideration
• demonstrating a range of technical skills, such as turns, jumps, falls, floor work and balances, which were combined in complex sequences
• relating skills directly and consistently to the themes of the work
• demonstrating highly controlled variations of spatial elements and also temporal and dynamic consideration that assisted the thematic ideas
• demonstrating highly skilled control of the elements of dance and conscientious manipulation of the dynamics to aid interpretation of the work
• displaying a highly skilled quality of line in movements
• engaging audience response.

Characteristics of weaker responses:

• presenting works that were more restricted in their range of skills
• presenting sequences that varied in complexity, relying on less complex skill combinations and individual skills
• attempting combinations that pushed beyond the limits of their anatomical structure, leading to loss of control of alignment
• lacking control in the core muscles leading to misalignments of the hip, ankle and shoulder, which were exacerbated by attempts to control speed or shifts in direction and level.

Core

Characteristics of better responses:

• using appropriate levels of personalisation and abstraction of movement, explored through purposeful choices of the elements
• developing well-designed motif(s) that clearly made links to the purpose of the concept
• demonstrating consistency in the development of structure and the relationship of structure to the furthering of the concept
• using transitions effectively to make seamless links between movement within phrases and between phrases and sections
• presenting appropriate repetition, variety and contrast of movement.

Characteristics of weaker responses:

• repeating favourite shapes/movements to which a meaning was attached, with very little development to assist clarity of the concept
• attempting abstraction and personalisation but not exploring ways to realise the concept
• not exploring space, shapes, levels, directions and pathways
• not exploring the application of time and dynamics to develop the concept
• moving predictably and with repetition, rather than manipulating and developing movement across the continuum of the dance
• relying on the application of spatial elements, mainly a shape or several shapes to which meaning was attached, to develop a motif
• not integrating all the elements of dance in creating a motif(s)
• developing within spatial elements, but with a lack of consistency in the application
• sequencing logically, but predictably, due to an over reliance on repetition.

Major study

Characteristics of better responses:

• being clear about the purpose of the movement
• using motif(s) and phrases that created relationships
• linking to a well-chosen accompaniment
• presenting movement manipulations through the relationships between the dancers that were purposeful to the development of the concept
• creating unity through a focus on a development of phrases, logical structure with subtleties and some unpredictability that enhanced interest
• using phrases with interesting variations and contrast that assisted the development of the intention of the work.

Characteristics of weaker responses:

• creating designs of bodies in space, with manipulation that was mechanical and repetitive and did not assist with the development of a concept
• giving less consideration to the application of time and dynamics in clarifying or developing the intention of the work.

Characteristics of better responses:

• using concepts that were achievable in movement development and enhanced by filmic considerations
• using motif and movement phrases that were further developed and manipulated by skilled use of framing, angles and shot selection
• having a close relationship between setting, costume, accompaniment and lighting that enhanced the development of the concept and supported the movement choices
• using editing effectively to assist with the development of the intent
• seamlessly sequencing the work, with well-chosen use of editing transitions that purposefully developed the intent.

Characteristics of weaker responses:

• relying on repetition of similar movement or unrelated movement that lacked purpose in the development of the concept
• using filmic considerations that were mechanical in nature
• lacking purpose with regard to the development of the intent and instead including favourite transitions or choices that might enhance the look of the film
• using editing ineffectively to assist with the development of the intent.

Question 1

Candidates showed strength in these areas:

• describing the link between the elements of dance and how contrast is created in the work Fine Line
• using appropriate language and relevant examples from the work that clearly supported the response
• presenting a consistently logical and cohesive response.

Candidates need to improve in these areas:

• addressing all aspects of the question
• providing sufficient detail when describing the movement
• answering the question asked rather than narrating a story.

Question 2

Candidates showed strength in these areas:

• describing the link between Kylian’s use of aural elements and how they enhance our interpretation of Sarabande
• using appropriate language and relevant examples from the work that clearly supported the response
• presenting a logical and cohesive response.

Candidates need to improve in these areas:

• addressing all aspects of the question
• choosing appropriate examples to support the response
• linking the parts of the question.

Candidates showed strength in these areas:

• demonstrating knowledge of the artists, their works and relevant contextual information
• understanding and using appropriate dance terminology
• structuring responses
• providing relevant examples.

Candidates need to improve in these areas:

• ensuring that all parts of the question are addressed
• answering the question asked rather than narrating a story or listing points.