Design and Technology 2018 HSC exam pack
2018 Design and Technology HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical exam
Students should:
- present the proposal and management section as a plan of future direction – writing the plans after the process has been completed is not recommended
- ensure that the project reflects the original need, as outlined at the beginning of the folio
- consider the management of the folio in terms of the marking process
- focus on outlining the product, system or environment that the student intends to make and not consider alternative projects.
In better projects, students were able to:
- develop the folio under the syllabus headings, making evidence clearly accessible.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using the font size and style as suggested and maintaining the 80-page limit
- keeping media presentations to a maximum of six minutes
- providing media evidence of successes and failures that were difficult to verbalise
- understanding that printable material in the media presentation adds to the page count
- avoiding the repetition of work and understanding that small-scale pictures or text in the folio and A4 copies on the wall around the project equate to an oversized folio
- ensuring that the font size and sketch are not too small and that the marker can easily read the text and see the image.
Students should:
- develop research that links to the project, system or environment being produced
- maximise the development of the design – evidence of the evolution of the product, system or environment should be seen in the creativity, sketching, model making, testing, experiments and refinements and should relate to the solution presented.
In better projects, students were able to:
- clearly identify practical skills that were used
- demonstrate a depth of knowledge to manipulate items within their skillset, as opposed to items that have been downloaded or outsourced – this is specifically evident in apps and architectural presentations
- clearly identify what they did in comparison to what the program pre-generated for them.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring that passwords and the timing out of computers that hold student work are clearly identified on the machine or on the table so that the computers can be rebooted
- not having more than one student project displayed on a single computer, if possible
- ensuring that language, images and any violent content in media presentations are appropriate for a general viewing audience.
Students should:
- minimise wordiness and maximise evaluating statements
- be succinct and offer information that relates directly to solving the problem they are trying to address, showing the relationship between the proposal and the presented items
- ensure that the folio tells the story of the student’s progression and the creation of a solution to the need they presented within the proposal.
In better projects, students were able to:
- design, research, test and clearly relate the results to determining a solution to the need
- draw conclusions that aid in the development of the solution or were seen in the final product
- use clear and succinct statements, avoiding unnecessary clutter.
Areas for students to improve include:
- understanding that projects will not be nominated for the Shape exhibition if they breach subject rules
- understanding that full pages of small font, minimum line spacing and tiny pictures are a poor way of communicating.
Feedback on written exam
Students should:
- develop an understanding of a wide range of emerging technologies and their impacts
- utilise examples to support their response, ensuring that each example is relevant to the question
- continue to develop their understanding of the key words ‘explain’ and ‘analyse’ to provide greater depth and breadth to their responses
- give ample time to better plan and structure both short answer and extended responses.
Question 11
In better responses, students were able to:
- refer to Figures 1 and 4 only (a)
- outline a different ergonomic benefit based on the provided stimulus for Figures 1 and 4 (a)
- specify an example of a design feature of a workstation (b)
- reference appropriate and relevant technological changes (b)
- relate technological changes to the design features in workstations (b).
Areas for students to improve include:
- reading the question carefully to avoid unnecessary reference to all stimulus material (a)
- providing reference to the specific ergonomic benefit of the appropriate figures (Figures 1 and 4) (a)
- identifying relevant technological changes or changes in technology (b)
- outlining specific examples related to the workstation (b).
Question 12
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide a comparative description of the differences between the processes of designing a new product and redesigning an existing product
- use relevant examples to highlight the points of difference.
Areas for students to improve include:
- identifying the different features of individual processes for designing a new product and redesigning an existing product
- providing relevant examples of the features of processes for designing a new product and redesigning an existing product that emphasise the points of difference.
Question 13
In better responses, students were able to:
- provide relevant examples of how emerging technologies used in the workplace have negative effects on security for the individual
- relate the relevant examples to the negative impacts and resultant effects on the individual’s security in the workplace – for example, personal data, privacy, robotics and automation.
Areas for students to improve include:
- understanding terminology – for example, not confusing security with safety or ethics
- specifically relating the use of appropriate new and emerging technologies to security for the individual in the workplace
- providing greater depth and breadth to their response.
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a detailed understanding of how improvements to communication methods have occurred as a direct consequence of new and emerging technologies
- provide relevant examples of communication technologies that have influenced the way individuals in society currently communicate socially and within commercial settings
- logically and coherently provide cause-and-effect statements linked to new and emerging technologies and provide analysis by articulating the resultant implications on communication.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using appropriate and relevant examples to support the arguments formulated in the response
- developing a better understanding of a wider range of current and emerging technologies (other than just smartphones), including the relevant impacts they have on the individual and society
- demonstrating more cohesive and sustained responses by planning prior to commencing each response
- developing a better understanding of the key word ‘analyse’ by drawing out statements and relating their implications to demonstrate a deep understanding of the issues being examined.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Design and Technology syllabus
Find out more about the Design and Technology syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.