English Studies 2024 HSC exam pack
2024 English Studies HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on written exam
Questions 1, 2 and 3
Students should:
- read the question carefully to ensure that they understand its intent and requirements
- have a clear understanding of key words in the question
- select relevant textual evidence to support their ideas
- avoid the use of personal opinions
- review their response to ensure that it addresses question requirements.
Question 1
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a clear and effective understanding of why Davis values the experiences she shared with her family
- use appropriate supporting evidence, for example, ‘you managed to take us on adventures that I- we- still value today.’
Areas for students to improve include:
- demonstrating a clear understanding of why Davis valued the experiences of travelling with the family
- identifying appropriate supporting evidence to support ideas around the value that Davis placed on her experiences growing up
- demonstrating a clear understanding rather than recounting the text.
Question 2
In better responses, students were able to:
- explain effectively how Moffatt represents her relationship with the Pacific Ocean
- use appropriate supporting evidence to help explain Moffatt’s relationship of the Pacific Ocean as ‘peaceful’ to most but a ‘liquid monolith’ and a ‘sad sea’ to her
- demonstrate clarity in their response.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using appropriate textual reference and avoiding recounting the text
- writing clearly and explaining rather than describing how Moffatt represented her ‘complicated relationship with the Pacific Ocean’.
Question 3
In better responses, students were able to:
- analyse effectively how Cogan represents her response to a new experience
- identify and analyse the shift in Cogan’s attitude from feeling inhibited to being engaged
- use language techniques as evidence
Areas for students to improve include:
- analysing rather than explaining the text
- writing clearly.
Question 4
In better responses, students were able to:
- explain effectively Brazil’s connection to place using well-chosen textual references to support her connection to Venice
- explain the link to connection to place.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using well-chosen supporting evidence
- explaining rather than providing a recount
- identifying Brazil’s connection to place using appropriate textual references to support.
Question 5
In better responses, students were able to:
- identify the complex concept of change
- explain effectively how Morton represented change through observing others and reflecting on her own life
- use well-chosen supporting evidence to articulate the experience of change.
Areas for students to improve include:
- using well-chosen evidence to support points about change
- explaining rather than recounting the events in the text
- identifying more than one aspect of change that is referenced in the text.
Students should:
- demonstrate an understanding of how texts represent human experiences
- develop a line of argument that addresses the question
- demonstrate a deep understanding of their prescribed text through a range of textual evidence
- compose an organised response with a logical sequence of arguments
- consider using a plan to help frame their response.
In better responses, students were able to:
- clearly articulate personal ‘insights’ from their study of the prescribed text
- develop a well-informed argument that explores the intricate and interrelated nature of ‘qualities, motivations and actions’
- purposefully select evidence from the most appropriate scene, chapter, poem, or section of their prescribed text
- use clear expression and appropriate language to reveal a personal understanding and ensure continuity of response.
Areas for students to improve include:
- identifying the ‘qualities, motivations, and actions’ of the human experience with greater clarity and specificity
- demonstrating an understanding of how the author's choice of specific language, such as the ocean motif in Past the Shallows; the use of film devices in Billy Elliot; or features such as dystopian tropes in Nineteen Eighty-Four, shapes meaning
- moving beyond the interior world of the text to a more conceptual argument about the composer’s purpose
- avoiding the use of verbose, inaccurate, or convoluted language that may detract from the quality of the response.
Students should:
- demonstrate understanding of the nature of a module through reference to a text studied
- write a structured response, appropriate to audience and purpose
- consider planning their response so that it is clear and logically structured.
In better responses, students were able to:
- express a thoughtful recommendation for which module should remain in the program using multiple reasons
- make detailed reference to a text that they studied in the chosen module and link it to the recommendation for the module should stay in the program.
Areas for students to improve include:
- expressing a recommendation and clearly articulating why it should be a part of the program
- making an explicit reference to a text studied in the module and expressing multiple reasons as to why it should stay
- developing a logical argument and sustaining it in a clear response.
Students should:
- use the stimulus quote as inspiration for a piece of imaginative, persuasive or reflective writing about a moment that led to personal growth
- use the features of either an imaginative, persuasive or reflective text
- write a structured response, appropriate to audience and purpose.
In better responses, students were able to:
- compose an effective and engaging imaginative, persuasive or reflective piece of writing using the stimulus of the mountain and the people climbing it
- effectively organise and sustain the ideas with a strong connection to the stimulus image
- use language appropriate to the chosen text type and the image presented.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring that the link to the given stimulus image is sustained throughout the response
- composing a piece of writing with the appropriate features of the chosen form
- using effective control of language in a coherent response.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
English Studies syllabus
Find out more about the English Studies syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.