Vietnamese Continuers 2016 HSC exam pack
2016 Vietnamese Continuers HSC exam papers
Vietnamese Continuers HSC Exam paper - transcript - audio 2016
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the examination paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows each question and the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the link(s) below to view feedback about how students performed in this year’s examination.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future examinations. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical examination
Section I – Conversation
Characteristics of better responses:
- responses were fluent, confident and spontaneous
- appropriate and extended responses were provided to the questions asked
- correct grammar, register and tenses, as well as a variety of complex sentence structures were used
- language was manipulated to address the questions asked
- a range of vocabulary appropriate to the topic was used
- authentic intonation and pronunciation were used
- standard language of study was used.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- simple, short sentences or single words were used
- grammatical errors, repetitions or extended pauses were evident
- English words and expressions were included.
Section II – Discussion
Characteristics of better responses:
- topics that allowed in-depth research and scope to propose and articulate a point of view and had a variety of readily accessible sources that presented different perspectives were chosen
- the texts chosen to support the topic of discussion were appropriate and were used consistently to support the point of view
- the processes involved in obtaining information were discussed
- a thorough understanding of the topic and the researched information was demonstrated through analysis of the texts and comparison of the various perspectives presented
- candidates reflected on their findings and evaluated the effectiveness of the research on their understanding of the topic
- at least three texts, one of which was a literary text, were included
- sophisticated language structures and reflective and evaluative style with highly developed grammatical accuracy and variation were used.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- appropriate reference to texts was not made
- over-reliance on general knowledge, personal experience or superficial information was evident
- no opinion or point of view was expressed
- texts and research were not linked to the topic
- there was a lack of evidence of research.
Feedback on written examination
Listening and Responding
Part A
Characteristics of better responses:
- analysis, synthesis and evaluation was evident where required
- excellent reference to the texts was made where required
- audience, purpose and context were identified where applicable.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- simple translations of text were provided rather than addressing the questions
- lists of ideas were presented without much explanation
- repetition of ideas was evident.
Part B
Characteristics of better responses:
- detailed and relevant responses to the questions were given
- perceptive understanding of the aural texts was demonstrated
- an excellent explanation was provided.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- responses did not refer to the text when required
- a literal translation of the aural text was given, rather than answering the question.
Reading and Responding
Part A
Characteristics of better responses:
- examples from the text were included where appropriate
- a perceptive understanding of the given texts was demonstrated.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- literal translations were presented rather than analysing the information and ideas in the texts
- a lack of reference to the text was evident.
Part B
Characteristics of better responses:
- the main points of the stimulus text were identified and manipulated to serve the purpose of the task
- candidates explained their experiences on the tour, using information provided on the evaluation card
- ideas and opinions were structured logically and coherently
- a variety of vocabulary and sentence structures were used.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- requirements of the question were not well understood
- a recount of the tour rather than an explanation of the experiences was presented.
Writing in Vietnamese
Characteristics of better responses:
- the speech was coherent and logical, and addressed the requirements of the task
- the purpose, context and audience of the speech were correctly identified
- an excellent command of vocabulary and language structures was demonstrated
- ideas were linked creatively.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- the requirements of the question were not met
- responses merely recounted events or situations, demonstrating a limited ability to structure ideas
- numerous errors and repetitions were included.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Vietnamese Continuers Syllabus
Find out more about the Vietnamese Continuers syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.