Heritage Korean 2015 HSC exam pack (archive)
2015 Heritage Korean HSC paper (archived)
Heritage Korean HSC Exam paper - transcript - audio 2015
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the examination paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows each question and the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
HSC marking feedback
Select from the link(s) below to view feedback about how students performed in this year’s examination.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future examinations. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical examination
Characteristics of better responses:
- a thorough analysis of information, ideas and experiences, using a variety of sources from a range of contexts was included
- detailed and perceptive references to the texts studied, including information on their reliability and usefulness, were made
- candidates connected their research findings to their ideas and experiences
- candidates justified their points of view which were supported with examples
- candidates actively participated in the interview and engaged effectively and consistently with the examiner without hesitation or pauses
- information and ideas were presented with a high level of grammatical accuracy, a range of vocabulary and sentence structures, and a high level of fluency and correct pronunciation.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- basic information or common knowledge was presented without evidence of research and the chosen topic was treated superficially
- candidates used prepared responses which had little relevance to the question being asked
- candidates made few or limited references to the texts studied
- information was presented with a low level of grammatical accuracy and with many pauses
- incomplete sentences and/or a mixture of formal and informal forms with some use of English vocabulary were used.
Feedback on written examination
Characteristics of better responses:
- candidates demonstrated a perceptive understanding of the texts, with appropriate examples provided to support answers
- language was manipulated competently to encourage participation in the competition (Q2)
- information from both texts was used and manipulated to produce a persuasive email to the mother (Q3)
- the ideas and issues presented in the diary entries were identified and used effectively to write the speech (Q4)
- candidates demonstrated a clear understanding of how applicable the lyrics were to today's Korea (Q5)
- candidates responded appropriately and effectively to the values, language and role of appearance as presented in the Blog entries
- a clear understanding of the purpose and audience was evident.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- a translation of the text was provided rather than responding to the question
- candidates did not address all aspects of the question
- a limited understanding of purpose, context and audience was shown
- a limited reference to the texts was made
- candidates used general knowledge rather than information provided in the stimulus text.
Characteristics of better responses:
- candidates addressed the chosen question
- the selection of register was appropriate to the audience, purpose and context
- ideas and information were sequenced and the response was structured coherently and effectively
- candidates showed evidence of understanding the issues being presented in the question.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- responses made limited use of information relevant to the question
- responses were poorly structured and contained many errors in both vocabulary and language structures
- some responses were unnecessarily long and included irrelevant pre-learnt texts and/or contained numerous errors and inaccuracies.
Request accessible format of this publication.