Music 1 2016 HSC exam pack
2016 Music 1 HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical exam
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- Selecting repertoire to display musical strengths, contrasts, exploration of dynamics and expressive techniques and vocal/instrumental tonal capabilities
- demonstrating technical and interpretative skills and personal engagement throughout the performance
- using balance and variety effectively within each solo or ensemble performance
- displaying an awareness of the overall musical structure and maintaining momentum
- demonstrating expressive and dynamic contrasts
- demonstrating familiarity with and understanding of the performance space and equipment, including starting backing tracks and microphones
- considering ensemble positioning to allow for effective interaction and engagement
- including supportive and integrated accompaniment that was secure
- having short and focussed sound checks and well prepared accompanists.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- choosing repertoire that is technically within the candidates’ skill level
- presenting musical content that has detail, variety and depth and provides opportunities to demonstrate technical and interpretative skills, rather than short, safe, limiting and repetitive repertoire
- not using sound checks as a disguise for additional rehearsal
- having appropriate ensemble balance
- preparing and tuning instruments prior to entering the examination centre
- sustaining engagement and momentum for the duration of the piece
- using appropriate backing tracks
- rehearsing in the chosen performance space prior to the day of the exam
- being engaged with the ensemble rather than focussing only on own performance or being occupied with reading lyrics
- placement of equipment in performance space, including amplifiers to assist ensemble communication
- understanding that no additional marks are awarded for presenting on more than one instrument
- understanding that if singing and playing an instrument at the same time, both parts of the performance are assessed
- avoiding splitting programs.
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- understanding the chosen style
- musical ideas.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- editing of compositions, including clefs and enharmonics
- including details of composition that are not provided by sequencing software
- notation of looping samples
- providing information and description of sounds for more unusual sound sources.
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- understanding and demonstrating a musicological emphasis in discussion using aural examples (recorded or practical demonstrations) to assist and augment the discussion
- drawing appropriate conclusions concerning the chosen topic
- demonstrating evidence of wide listening with the broader topic.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- being willing to engage in a two-way discussion rather than a prepared speech
- presenting concise outline summaries that are presented on the M2 form to help support the discussion
- avoiding using generalisations in discussion
- having relevant musical recordings queued at the appropriate point ready to play.
Feedback on written exam
Question 1
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- clearly referring to sections within the structure and sound sources
- linking structure and sound sources well.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- providing detailed and accurate terminology when describing sound sources
- discussing the role of the sound source.
Question 2
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- demonstrating understanding of the concept.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- answering the question in full
- describing texture more fully – not just thick and thin; homophonic, polyphonic, monophonic
- labelling diagrams and graphic notation used.
Question 3
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- demonstrating an organised approach using a range of styles
- showing understanding of the expressive techniques and duration.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- addressing both concepts referred to in the question
- structuring the response to ensure the question is answered
- providing detail within each section.
Question 4
Candidates showed strength in these areas:
- using labelled diagrams to describe pitch movement in responses
- identifying the primary sound sources and their roles.
Candidates need to improve in these areas:
- exploring a range of concepts and their contribution to tension
- using appropriate musical terminology, particularly in regard to strings
- discussing features from the whole excerpt
- using the title and artist’s information as a guide to what may be heard, for example, two cellos.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Music 1 syllabus
Find out more about the Music 1 syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.