Music 1 2019 HSC exam pack
2019 Music 1 HSC exam paper
Marking guidelines
Marking guidelines are developed with the exam paper and are used by markers to guide their marking of a student's response. The table shows the criteria with each mark or mark range.
Sample answers may also be developed and included in the guidelines to make sure questions assess a student's knowledge and skills, and guide the Supervisor of Marking on the expected nature and scope of a student's response. They are not intended to be exemplary or even complete answers or responses.
Marking feedback
Select from the sections below to view feedback from HSC markers about how students performed in this year’s exam.
Use the feedback to guide preparation for future exams. Feedback includes an overview of the qualities of better responses. Feedback may not be provided for every question.
Feedback on practical exam
Students should:
- select and present repertoire that provides opportunities to demonstrate technical and interpretative skills and displays their musical strengths
- ensure effective balance and variety within solo or ensemble performances
- demonstrate an awareness of the overall musical structure of each piece
- ensure sound checks before each piece are short and efficient
- have supportive and well-rehearsed accompaniment or high quality backing tracks that allows for a secure musical outcome
- ensure all paperwork is completed prior to the examination.
In better performances, students were able to:
- present repertoire that is technically within their skill level
- display attention to detail and explore variety to create interest
- sustain personal engagement and momentum for the duration of each piece
- consider the overall performance program and carefully tune before each piece
- be familiar with the performance space and equipment used.
Areas for students to improve include:
- selecting repertoire that suits their technical and interpretative skills
- ensuring that the balance is tailored to suit the space being used for the exam
- ensuring that pieces do not exceed the time limit
- avoiding splitting the program
- having sound checks that are short and focused.
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate their understanding of score conventions and appropriate performance directions
- use rhythmic and harmonic complexity effectively
- create compositions that were structurally coherent with seamless transitions
- demonstrate successful interplay between layers, such as, i.e. voices/ instruments, melodic/rhythmic ostinati, motifs or themes, harmonic/rhythmic/ tonal interplay
- create idiomatic compositions displaying an extensive stylistic understanding.
Areas for students to improve include:
- understanding of harmonic language
- studying accurate vocal notation
- a greater understanding of instruments and their capabilities
- avoiding overworking ideas with an over-reliance on use of riffs and ostinati to create momentum
- avoiding ideas that are underdeveloped including too many new ideas
- avoiding structurally incohesive compositions
- creating accurate and clear scores which can be reproduced.
Students should:
- demonstrate a sustained musicological focus
- organise aural examples (recorded or practical demonstrations) to assist and augment the discussion
- draw appropriate conclusions in relation to the chosen topic
- demonstrate evidence of wider listening within the broader topic
- demonstrate an understanding of musical terminology
- ensure points on summary sheets form a logical structure for further discussion and are easy to read.
In better responses, students were able to:
- demonstrate a genuine interest in the topic, engage in a two-way discussion and communicate proactively
- present concise and legible summaries on the M2 form to help guide the discussion
- use relevant and accurate musicological terminology
- address specific features supported by relevant musical recordings
- rehearse the viva voce in the chosen space with required equipment prior to the exam.
Areas for students to improve include:
- refining and reviewing the summary sheet when preparing for the exam to better guide the discussion
- engaging in a conversation and avoiding a prepared speech
- avoiding generalisations in discussion
- having recordings readily accessible and cued at the appropriate point ready to play
- demonstrating a broader understanding of the topic presented.
Feedback on written exam
Question 1
In better responses, students were able to:
- clearly articulate features of duration, for example, rhythmic unison, time signatures changes, riffs and changes between each section
- write coherently with a clear focus on the given concept
- isolate each instrument and discuss their individual rhythmic roles
- use correct terminology.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring that they have focus in their response
- understanding the difference between duration and pitch and/or texture ensuring specific and relevant discussion with use of appropriate terminology.
Question 2
In better responses, students were able to:
- describe pitch and expressive techniques in a detailed and sophisticated manner using correct terminology
- identify nuances in expressive techniques for example the differences in vibrato in different sections
- accurately use graphic notation to demonstrate melodic movement
- discuss the use of both melody and harmony in relation to pitch
- provide a sequential analysis of the excerpt in relation to the concepts
- write succinct and yet detailed answers which fully addressed the concepts.
Areas for students to improve include:
- labelling all diagrams and graphic notation to enhance the response in relation to the question, for example, sound sources
- writing legible, detailed, relevant and clearly structured responses
- using appropriate language and terminology when discussing the concepts
- avoiding the use of subjective and emotive language.
Question 3
In better responses, students were able to:
- describe the impact of technology and link it seamlessly to both tone colour and texture
- incorporate accurate and specific technology terminology, for example dubstep, kicks, sampling, manipulation and synthesizers
- explain the effect of reverb, skittering, bass drop and loops, for example, on tone colour and texture
- write a focused, detailed and clearly structured response which used appropriate language in relation to technology and the stated concepts.
Areas for students to improve include:
- ensuring responses are legible and diagrams are clearly labelled
- addressing all aspects of the question
- developing a greater understanding of tone colour in relation to technology.
Question 4
In better responses, students were able to:
- use musical terminology accurately and appropriately
- make perceptive musical observations using a variety of music concepts and relate these to unity and contrast
- recognise the instrumentation accurately and describe the roles of instruments in relation to both unity and contrast
- describe in detail the changes that occurred throughout the excerpt and relate these to both unity and contrast.
Areas for students to improve include:
- structuring answers chronologically to avoid repetition and confusion
- analysing texture by describing the layers and their relationship rather than relying on a label such as ‘polyphonic’
- using relevant and clearly labelled diagrams to support observations
- expanding answers to include a discussion of more than one concept when describing unity and contrast
- ensuring they understand the difference between variety and contrast.
HSC exam resources
Search for more HSC standards materials and exam packs.
Music 1 syllabus
Find out more about the Music 1 syllabus.
Request accessible format of this publication.